🔗 Share this article

This decision by the Democratic National Committee to withhold the publication regarding its own autopsy report concerning the last presidential race seems remarkable however entirely predictable. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the party's leadership apparatus behaves closer to a PR firm rather than an electoral entity devoted to building local power to secure victories.

An Environment Resistant to Internal Critique

Reluctant to challenge the party establishment's culture of conformity, the DNC has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout 2025. Releasing an official autopsy would have indicated that the leadership truly desire to encourage public discourse about the errors that paved the way for the former president to become president again. Yet, the leadership is moving forward as if there are no lessons to be learned from the tragic debacle of 2024.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? If the answer is no, it becomes a sideline issue from what truly matters," a justification reportedly given to justify concealing the analysis.

Critical Problems a Report Might Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem worth its salt would confront certain uncomfortable matters. Among them are:

• Voter Disenchantment: Failing to retain among a significant portion of the electorate who voted for the party's candidate in 2020 was decisive in the close 2024 election.
• The Choice to Run: The stubborn decision of the incumbent to stay in the race, alongside a last-minute withdrawal, is seen by some as robbing the party's base the chance for open primaries.
• Abandoning the Working-Class Base: During a time of inflation, the campaign is criticized for ceding to powerful financial backers without successfully attempting to challenge the role of big business.
• A Gaza Effect: The failure to shift a stance concerning the situation in Gaza allegedly caused alienating key demographic groups, particularly with young people, Arab-Americans, Muslim voters.
• A Decline in Young Voter Support: Polling data shows a major decrease in votes for the candidate from voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern Avoiding Accountability

This refusal is consistent with a longstanding habit of evading difficult realities. It echoes an episode where the vast majority of elected Democrat in Washington supported an incumbent's insistence on seeking another term right up until a poor public debate performance forced a change.

At the same time, overwhelming numbers within the party's base had been repeatedly informing pollsters that they did not want the incumbent to run again.

Campaign Spending Questions

A thorough report would also investigate questions regarding campaign spending, including how much money went to insider consultants and media firms during an electoral effort that managed to spend an enormous sum in a short period.

The Underlying Implication

Fundamentally, the secrecy of the official autopsy highlights an allegiance to the established hierarchy responsible for an unsuccessful national race. The message to the party's base – including millions of loyal volunteers – appears to be that they do not be trusted to know what the insiders say they discovered from a report compiled from extensive interviews.

An organization unwilling to honestly assess where it went wrong is unlikely to break free from the pattern that ended up being so helpful to the winning candidate.